Patient Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Vs. Open Hip Fracture Repair

Patient Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Vs. Open Hip Fracture Repair

Authors

  • Dr Gavireddy Naga Srinivasa Rao

Keywords:

Hip fracture, minimally invasive surgery, functional outcomes, perioperative outcomes, geriatric orthopedics

Abstract

Introduction: Hip fractures are a significant health concern, especially among the elderly, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to compare patient outcomes following minimally invasive versus open hip fracture repair, addressing the ongoing debate about optimal surgical approaches.

Methods: A prospective, comparative cohort study was conducted over 6 months, involving 150 patients (75 per group) undergoing hip fracture repair. Patients were assessed for perioperative outcomes, complications, functional recovery using the Harris Hip Score, and quality of life using the EQ-5D index. Data were collected preoperatively, immediately post-surgery, and at 6 weeks and 6 months follow-up.

Results: The minimally invasive group showed significant advantages in perioperative outcomes, including shorter operative time (68.5 vs 82.7 minutes, p=0.001), lower blood loss (median 150 vs 250 mL, p<0.001), and shorter hospital stay (median 5 vs 7 days, p=0.003). Early functional outcomes were superior in the minimally invasive group, with higher Harris Hip Scores at 6 weeks (68.3 vs 63.8, p=0.038) and better quality of life (EQ-5D index 0.65 vs 0.58, p=0.027). However, these differences were not statistically significant at 6 months. Complication rates were similar between groups, though a trend towards fewer surgical site infections was observed in the minimally invasive group.

Conclusion: Minimally invasive hip fracture repair demonstrates significant short-term benefits in perioperative outcomes and early functional recovery. However, long-term functional outcomes appear similar to open surgery. These findings suggest that minimally invasive techniques may be particularly beneficial for elderly or frail patients, where rapid recovery and reduced surgical stress are crucial.

Author Biography

Dr Gavireddy Naga Srinivasa Rao

gnsrinavasarao@gmail.comAssistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Rama Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh.

References

Bhandari, M., Devereaux, P. J., Swiontkowski, M. F., Tornetta III, P., Obremskey, W., Koval, K. J., ... & Guyatt, G. H. (2009). Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck: a meta-analysis. JBJS, 91(6), 1339-1347.

Burgers, P. T., Van Geene, A. R., Van den Bekerom, M. P., Van Lieshout, E. M., Blom, B., Aleem, I. S., ... & Poolman, R. W. (2015). Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials. International orthopaedics, 36(8), 1549-1560.

Chen, X., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Ren, J., & Liu, Z. (2013). Incidence of and factors influencing femoral neck shortening in elderly patients after fracture fixation with multiple cancellous screws. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 19, 1355.

Clement, N. D., Green, K., Murray, N., Duckworth, A. D., McQueen, M. M., & Court-Brown, C. M. (2011). Undisplaced intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly: predicting fixation failure and mortality. A prospective study of 162 patients. Journal of orthopaedic science, 18(4), 578-585.

Fadero, P. E., & Shah, M. (2014). Three dimensional (3D) modeling and surgical planning in trauma and orthopaedics. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 7(2), 169-175.

Foss, N. B., Kristensen, M. T., Kristensen, B. B., Jensen, P. S., & Kehlet, H. (2007). Effect of postoperative epidural analgesia on rehabilitation and pain after hip fracture surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Anesthesiology, 106(6), 1037-1043.

Haidukewych, G. J., & Berry, D. J. (2003). Hip arthroplasty for salvage of failed treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. JBJS, 85(5), 899-904.

Jayasekera, N., Nano, T., & Apthorp, H. (2011). Intraoperative assessment of reduction and implant placement in intertrochanteric hip fractures. Injury, 42(11), 1315-1319.

Johnell, O., & Kanis, J. A. (2006). An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis international, 17(12), 1726-1733.

Kammerlander, C., Gosch, M., Kammerlander-Knauer, U., Luger, T. J., Blauth, M., & Roth, T. (2011). Long-term functional outcome in geriatric hip fracture patients. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 131(10), 1435-1444.

Kaplan, K., Miyamoto, R., Levine, B. R., Egol, K. A., & Zuckerman, J. D. (2008). Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. II: intertrochanteric fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 16(11), 665-673.

Lin, Y. C., Cheng, Y. W., Shih, C. M., Huang, K. C., & Pan, R. Y. (2012). Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures. Injury, 43(8), 1372-1378.

Liu, M., Yang, Z., Pei, F., Huang, F., Chen, S., & Xiang, Z. (2009). A meta-analysis of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treating peritrochanteric fractures. International orthopaedics, 34(3), 323-328.

Parker, M. J., & Gurusamy, K. S. (2005). Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2).

Parker, M. J., & Johansen, A. (2006). Hip fracture. Bmj, 333(7557), 27-30.

Zlowodzki, M., Brink, O., Switzer, J., Wingerter, S., Woodall Jr, J., Petrisor, B. A., ... & Bhandari, M. (2008). The effect of shortening and varus collapse of the femoral neck on function after fixation of intracapsular fracture of the hip: a multi-centre cohort study. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 90(11), 1487-1494.

Downloads

Published

15-01-2017

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...